Unverified Commit c3848d59 authored by Gavin Zhao's avatar Gavin Zhao
Browse files

rocmPackages.rocblas: add comments about why some GPU archs are not built 



Signed-off-by: default avatarGavin Zhao <git@gzgz.dev>
parent 32b9f37d

pkgs/development/rocm-modules/6/rocblas/default.nix

+8 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -29,6 +29,14 @@ 
, tensileSepArch ? false

, tensileLazyLib ? false

, tensileLibFormat ? "msgpack"

# `gfx940`, `gfx941` are not present in this list because they are early

# engineering samples, and all final MI300 hardware are `gfx942`:

# https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/298388#issuecomment-2032791130

#

# `gfx1012` is not present in this list because the ISA compatibility patches

# would force all `gfx101*` GPUs to run as `gfx1010`, so `gfx101*` GPUs will

# always try to use `gfx1010` code objects, hence building for `gfx1012` is

# useless: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/298388#issuecomment-2076327152

, gpuTargets ? [ "gfx900;gfx906:xnack-;gfx908:xnack-;gfx90a:xnack+;gfx90a:xnack-;gfx942;gfx1010;gfx1030;gfx1100;gfx1101;gfx1102" ]

}: