This project is mirrored from https://github.com/mantidproject/mantid.git.
Pull mirroring updated .
- 08 Jun, 2012 3 commits
-
-
Doucet, Mathieu authored
-
Roman Tolchenov authored
-
Roman Tolchenov authored
-
- 07 Jun, 2012 21 commits
-
-
Russell Taylor authored
-
Campbell, Stuart authored
Forgot the () on the ELSE statement.
-
Campbell, Stuart authored
Commented out for now.
-
Russell Taylor authored
As they're now bundled into our repo.
-
Dennis Mikkelson authored
The Horizontal graph will now scroll left/right as the image is scrolled left/right. The Vertical graph will now scroll up/down as the image is scrolled up/down. However, if the cut level is scrolled off the screen, the corresponding graph will not be drawn. refs #5058
-
Campbell, Stuart authored
-
Campbell, Stuart authored
This will be used on Mac/Windows to find the HDF5 libs.
-
Campbell, Stuart authored
Defines where the libraries are for Mac.
-
Campbell, Stuart authored
Defines where the binaries are.
-
Russell Taylor authored
-
Doucet, Mathieu authored
-
Doucet, Mathieu authored
-
Doucet, Mathieu authored
-
Doucet, Mathieu authored
-
Peter Parker authored
Check for numpy package version as well as OS. Highlighted out win64 and lnx64 parts for now. Should just be able to uncomment them, and add the libraries when they are ready to be added. Also removed the annoying error messages popping up during system tests. Still a stop-gap measure until compilation of the Fortran code can be put into the automated build process of Mantid.
-
Owen Arnold authored
-
Owen Arnold authored
-
Owen Arnold authored
-
Owen Arnold authored
-
Lynch, Vickie authored
-
Lynch, Vickie authored
-
- 06 Jun, 2012 13 commits
-
-
Russell Taylor authored
Also act on a TODO about changing the TofEvent member variable visibility back to protected from public. This accounts for most of the changes as people had just used the members directly instead of accessor methods. A few places were using it to modify the members directly. I was able to change the logic to get around this in all cases except for LoadEventNexus.
-
Russell Taylor authored
-
Michael Reuter authored
-
Michael Reuter authored
-
Owen Arnold authored
-
Owen Arnold authored
-
Owen Arnold authored
-
Peter Parker authored
Reverting "Refs #4256 prevent plots from disappearing if resized too small", which unfortunately caused the bug. Replaced that code with the less heavy-handed "getMinimumSizeHint" overides. (This reverts commit a8033e6c.)
-
Peter Parker authored
Now allowing devs to ask that MWRunFiles deals with file finding via a specified algorithm property instead of the default method of passing the user's inputs straight to FileFinder, which is ill-equipped to deal with complex multi file loading / addition, etc. LoadDialog now uses MWRunFiles in this way, via the "Filename" property of Load. This indirectly solves most (all?) of the recent problems surrounding the Load dialog, which are a result of my lack of understanding in how it could be affected by adding the multi file functionality. I had certainly not intended for LoadDialog to be even used for multi-file loading at this stage, and so had simply not catered for it or spotted the problems caused. Mea culpa. There are still some outstanding issues: 1) Currently, the suggested ws name given to Load by the dialog is just the "base" of the first filename, i.e. loading IRS21000+21009.raw produces a ws with the name "IRS21000". This name is neither helpful or accurate. 2) After loading multiple files and then reopening the dialog, the MWRunFiles widget contains the full file name of the first file ONLY. This issue is compounded by the fact that specifying addition / ranges of files during multi file loading is supported via the syntax [full_path][inst][run]+[run][.ext] BUT NOT [full_path][inst][run]+[full_path][inst][run][.ext]. As far as I can tell it is only going to be possible to either: a) display the full file path of the files that have been found but not specify which files were added to which; OR b) accurately display which files are being added to which, but not display their full files path. If b) is to be implemented I can not comment on how big a loss (if at all) not seeing full file paths would be. a) Does not seem to be a reasonable option.
-
Owen Arnold authored
-
Owen Arnold authored
-
Owen Arnold authored
-
Owen Arnold authored
-
- 05 Jun, 2012 3 commits
-
-
Russell Taylor authored
-
Russell Taylor authored
-
Russell Taylor authored
-