@@ -264,4 +264,51 @@ Claude produced [Hack-A-Thon-2026-Day4-Summary.md](../Hack-A-Thon-2026-Day4-Summ
Thank you so much! Before we say goodbye, is there anything we should remember from this (long) sesssion that would be useful in the cross-project knowledge system?
```
⏺ Yes — eight things worth saving across categories. Let me write them and tell you what went where.
Wrote 6 memories (ctrl+o to expand)
⏺ Updating the user profile (the "scientific writer" framing was the bootstrap, well outdated by what we now know).
Wrote 1 memory (ctrl+o to expand)
⏺ Now updating MEMORY.md index.
Recalled 1 memory, wrote 2 memories (ctrl+o to expand)
⏺ Saved to memory:
4 feedback memories (working-style preferences/patterns we proved out):
1. feedback_summary_workflow.md — the manifest → Google Doc → transcripts → PDFs order, validated across 5 hack-a-thon days.
2. feedback_pdf_quirks.md — scanner-inverted pages are per-page; manifests under-report; verify each page.
3. feedback_macos_office_automation.md — PowerPoint/Keynote AppleScript reliably times out on this machine; use python-pptx; clean up
zombie polling shells after AppleScript failures.
4. feedback_context_checkpoint.md — the 75% context checkpoint protocol you prescribed (proven on the Day-4 summary; should be a
default for any long synthesis task).
2 reference memories (reusable techniques):
5. reference_office_xml_parsing.md — parsing .xlsx and .docx with stdlib only (zipfile + ElementTree); the newer-vs-older Excel
namespace gotcha; sheet-name → file mapping via rels; the purl.oclc.org/ooxml vs schemas.openxmlformats.org distinction.
6. reference_ewm_estimation.md — the focused-effort × process-tax estimation pattern from the EWM Estimation Baseline. Reusable for
any team with logged Time Spent.
1 user-profile correction:
7. user_profile.md — corrected the bootstrap framing ("scientific writer") to your actual profile (computational software engineer at
ORNL Neutron Sciences, Reflectometry suite, heavy agentic-engineering user, the team you collaborate with). Includes your
working-style preferences I observed: thorough-and-citable summaries, why explanations in memories, file backups before destructive
edits, polite-prompt style, the 75% checkpoint protocol.
MEMORY.md index updated to point to all six new files plus the two prior ones.
I deliberately did not save:
- Hack-a-thon-specific names of attendees, scientific issues, or codebases — those live in tasking/Hack-A-Thon-2026-Day*-Summary.md
and would just rot in memory.
- The Day-1–4 narrative content — derivable from the summary files when needed.
- Specific paths or PR numbers — derivable from git log when relevant.
- The "ten levels of danger" anecdote — colourful but project-specific.
If any of these don't match your judgment, tell me which to remove or rewrite. Otherwise — thank you for an excellent week of
