@@ -227,3 +227,36 @@ Slide 2) A slide that details how parts of what a future ideal state decoupled b
Let me know if you think additional slides would be useful beyond the two I request above.
```
Both slides committed: tasking b72d6dd, parent gitlink 296c06b. SVG sources + 1920×1080 PNGs + render.sh helper in plan/quicknxsv2-modularization/slides/.
Recommendations for additional slides
The two you asked for are the strongest opening pair. If you have slots for more, here are the highest-leverage ones in priority order — happy to produce any of these in a follow-up session.
Top priority (directly scientist-facing):
1. "The 5 silent MRR default disagreements" — a compact table with one row per tension (ErrorWeightedBackground, CropFirstAndLastPoints, RoundUpPixel, AcceptNullReflectivity, UseSANGLE), each with "physics meaning → observable → who sees it → what
we'd agree on". Directly answers "do I trust my numbers?" — a question scientists will raise whether or not it's on the agenda. Pairs well with slide 1's "GUI R(Q) ≠ autoreduce R(Q)" bullet.
2. "What scientists actually see today" — a mock R(Q) plot with two slightly-offset curves (autoreduce + GUI), annotated to show the factor-of-~1% QuickNXS scale difference and the ErrorWeighted-background shift at low S/N. One picture, one
sentence. Makes the abstract "silent disagreement" visceral.
Medium priority (supports Day 2 and Day 3 sessions):
3. "A peak drag, traced from click to plot" — sequence diagram of the 4-deepcopy pipeline (Qt signal → update_configuration_from_ui → DataManager.update_configuration → per-cross-section deepcopy → synchronous MRR → redraw). Makes the "why the UI
freezes" and "why parameter propagation is fragile" concrete.
4. "The ideal reduce() contract" — pseudocode mockup of the unified back-end's top signature with short annotations: what's in the configuration parameter, what ReducedRun contains, how both the GUI and autoreduce invoke the same function. Supports
the Day 3 requirements document.
Lower priority (useful but specialized):
5. Debt triage matrix — 2D chart of Tier-1..Tier-4 debt items on (cost, payoff) axes. Useful for Day 4 ticket-generation but probably premature on Day PRE-2.
6. Test equivalence harness proposal — one-slide pipeline for how to A/B the GUI and autoreduce paths before/after the refactor. Useful for Day 1 assessment but arguably belongs to the developer track.
My recommendation: if you only add one more, make it #1 (the 5 silent defaults) — it is the tightest bridge from your slide 1's "GUI and autoreduce disagree" claim to a concrete, numerate set of decisions the scientists can sign off on. If you add
two, add #2 as well so scientists see the disagreement, not just read about it.
```
### Prompt 2.3
Ok, this is superb. One thing: would you review '/home/6ov/Pictures/Screenshots/slide1-text-issue.png' (what I see from 'slide-1-current-vs-ideal.png'), there are some text alignment and arrow issues I have circled in red. Regarding the additional slides, I certainly do have slots for more. Please go ahead as you propose with all 6 new slides. Thank you so much!
